In the bustling heart of Atlanta, accidents are an unfortunate reality. When these tragic events strike, the road to recovery becomes paramount. Financial compensation can be a significant part of this recovery, but understanding its legal complexities is essential. One of these is the concept of comparative negligence, a principle that plays a crucial role in personal injury claims in Georgia.
As accidents unfold, it’s not always clear-cut who is at fault. Both parties might have played a part in the event’s unfortunate outcome. Understanding how Georgia’s legal system views such situations can be the difference between a successful claim and a frustrating deadlock.
The concept of comparative negligence
Comparative negligence, as practiced in Georgia, is a method that assigns a degree of fault to each party involved in an accident. Rather than pointing fingers solely at one party, the system understands that accidents are often a result of multiple factors and actions. In Georgia, if you’re found to be less than 50% at fault, you can still seek damages, but the percentage of your award, if any, will be reduced.
If you’re seeking compensation after an accident, understanding this principle can be the linchpin of your claim. If you’ve been in an accident, it’s essential to gather evidence supporting your stance. This can range from witness testimonials to video footage or expert opinions.
Because of the complexities of this type of claim, it’s often best to have someone on your side who understands how to showcase your points. It’s best to do this quickly because Georgia law limits the time you have to get your claim filed.